Bill Unveiled To Transfer US ATC To Non-Profit

February 3, 2016

Republicans in the US House of Representatives have introduced a measure to put the national air traffic control system in the hands of a new private non-profit corporation run by airlines and other stakeholders.

The long-anticipated measure would transfer air traffic operations and 38,000 government employees from the Federal Aviation Administration to the non-profit, in a bid to reduce flight delays, speed the adoption of next-generation technology and insulate the system's funding from congressional gridlock.

Democrats and other critics warned that the move could lead to a costlier, less-efficient system controlled by the airline industry. They vowed to unveil a rival plan for targeted reform that would protect air traffic control from congressional politics by making its funding mandatory.

"Our system is incredibly inefficient, and it will only get worse as passenger levels grow and as the FAA falls further behind in modernising the system," said US Representative Bill Shuster, a Pennsylvania Republican who chairs the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee.

Shuster, who expects to send the legislation to the floor of the House next week for a possible vote, said the plan is based on private air traffic control operations in other countries, including Canada and Britain.

The bill won ready backing from Airlines For America, an industry trade group, and the main air traffic controllers union.

But its future was unclear ahead of the November election.

"We cannot support the proposal," said Representative Peter DeFazio of Oregon, the committee's senior Democrat, who said he was concerned about whether it would meet acceptable safety, national security and public interest standards.

Unionised commercial pilots also objected to the measure. Delta Air Lines has already warned that it would lead to higher costs for passengers.

Republicans anticipate a three-year transition from government to private control under the proposal. It is expected to reduce annual federal FAA spending from USD$14 billion to USD$3 billion, aides said. Lost tax revenue would be replaced by user fees. But those details have yet to be worked out by the House Ways and Means Committee, which has jurisdiction over taxes.

Republicans said privatisation is necessary to ensure greater efficiency and modernisation, pointing to a recent Transportation Department report saying two decades of reform have failed to make the FAA more efficient.

(Reuters)